Re: Semantic Business Intelligence

Milton,

Any kind of collaboration would be greatly appreciated. What do you think
are the best means to collaborate, compare notes or 'brainstorm' on the
subject?

Best regards,
Sebastian.


On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 2:04 PM, ProjectParadigm-ICT-Program <
metadataportals@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Dear Sebastian,
>
> Global universal digital dashboards, which are semantic technology
> enabled, form a subset of Semantic Business Intelligence, and an area of
> hot research in ICT for (sustainable) development, eHealth, mHeatlh and the
> Internet of Things. The W3C has two Community Groups active in areas which
> touch directly upon this subject being SWISIG and CSCG.I think it would be
> very useful to compare notes and projects and define common ground for
> further collaboration.
>
> Can w brainstorm collectively on this issue?
>
> Milton Ponson
> GSM: +297 747 8280
> PO Box 1154, Oranjestad
> Aruba, Dutch Caribbean
> Project Paradigm: A structured approach to bringing the tools for
> sustainable development to all stakeholders worldwide through collaborative
> research on applied mathematics, advanced modelling and creating ICT tools
> for development
>
> This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed..
> If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager..
> This message contains confidential information and is intended only for the
> individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should not
> disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail.
>
>
>
>   On Wednesday, July 1, 2015 7:55 PM, Sebastian Samaruga <
> cognescent@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Daniel, Thanks for the response. I'll try to reply your question inline
> with your message:
>
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 6:41 AM, Daniel Hladky <daniel.hladky@ontos.com>
> wrote:
>
> Sebastian,
>
> Are you trying to build something similar to http://stack.linkeddata..org/
> <http://stack.linkeddata.org/>
>
>
> No, I'm trying to develop a very minimalistic knowledge component reusable
> in other applications. Yes, it will have APIs for alignment and merging of
> datasets, link discovery and resource identity resolution but only in a
> given domain of discourse which is the RDF (plain) data from which the
> component is populated. 'Plain' RDF means I have *no schema information* in
> the input datasets, data could be gathered from any source, even a CSV
> file. The final deployment is a RESTful service which takes RDF fragments
> as input and returns the augmented knowledge regarding those fragments and
> also 'learns' (indexes) the queries (answers) and returns results
> (responses). Another RESTful service being built is one that enables a
> Semantic / Object mapping returning an object graph representation of the
> responses, serialized in a manner which allows to populate classes, objects
> and properties in the client (JSON, JAXB).
>
>
> The stack was developed as part of the LOD2 and GeoKnow project. Both
> projects are (have been) funded by the EU FP7 program. We at Ontos are part
> of the GeoKnow project and involved in the framework.
>
> The stack follows the linked data life-cycle and when checking your
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2015Feb/0096.html it
> seems to me that you try to achieve the same thing.
>
> If not here a set of questions:
>
>
> No
>
>
>
> What are you trying to do on top of our linked data stack?
>
>
> At least now, I'll make no use of the linked data stack.. The component
> has an activation framework which enables me to gather the domain
> information I need directly from the business data sources.
>
>
>
> What are the use cases?
>
>
> Augmentation of CMS repositories. Master Data Management (BI)
>
>
>
> Do you plan any specific analytical modules?
>
>
> There is the syllogistic reasoning mode which allows using Resources and
> their (class/instance) IDs and their Links to reason in this way:
>
> Socrates kind Human.
> Human life Mortal
> Socrates kind*life Mortal.
>
>
>
>
> How would you compare your solution against traditional BI solutions?
> (Pentaho, SAP, Business Objects etc)
>
>
> The component can be used as a client consuming or service provider for
> those solutions.
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 8:52 PM, Sebastian Samaruga <cognescent@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi all. There is a draft I've been working for a while and I'm needing
> help trying to laid down some ideas for the core concepts of a platform
> that should enable data/schema merging, discovery and augmentation of data
> provided by many different sources.
>
> Then there should be an API exploiting the concept of 'arithmetic'
> inference and reasoning using 'meaningful' numeric identifiers. The
> document describing the ongoing outermost concepts is in a PDF file
> attached to this document. If there are problems with the attachment the
> file is accessible at:
>
> https://drive.google..com/open?id=0BxxuOINjaiBNcW11ODJXYkFzUGs&authuser=0
> <https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxxuOINjaiBNcW11ODJXYkFzUGs&authuser=0>
>
> Some techniques on Mappings similarity hashing and merging and Template
> aggregation for presentation/layers interaction purposes left to be defined
> completely.
>
> The most important thing I'm needing right now are comments and criticisms
> that could help me refine my concepts. Thanks in advance,
>
> Best regards,
> Sebastian Samaruga.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> *_________________________________________________________________________________*
> *Daniel Hladky, *CEO & VR
>
> *Ontos AG                                                         **Ontos
> GmbH*
> Mittelstrasse 24, 2560 Nidau, Switzerland         Ostwaldstr. 4, 04329
> Leipzig, Germany
> *E* daniel.hladky@ontos.com <daniel.hladky@ontos.co%21%0d%0a%20mh>      *W
>  *www.ontos.com <http://www.ontos.comh/>         *Amtsgericht Leipzig,
> HRB 25146*
> *M* +41 79 3535043                     *T  *+41 32 3329250          *T  *+49
> 32 3329250
> Verwaltungsrat: Daniel Hladky
>    Geschäftsführer: Daniel Hladky
>
> *_________________________________________________________________________________*
> This e-mail (including any attachments) contains confidential information
> and may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure.
> The information contained herein is intended for the use of the intended
> addressee only. Please be aware that any disclosure, copying,
> imitation, distribution, dissemination or other use of the content of this
> e-mail, either by non-intended recipients or by the intended recipient for
> any
> other than the intended purpose of forwarding, is prohibited. If you
> received this e-mail by error, please notify the sender immediately by reply
> e-mail and delete this e-mail and any attachments from your system. Thank
> you for your co-operation.  We also like to inform you that
> communication via e-mail over the Internet is insecure because third
> parties may have the possibility to access and manipulate e-mails.
>
>
>
>
>