- From: John Flynn <jflynn12@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:32:45 -0500
- To: "'Harry Halpin'" <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, "'Semantic Web'" <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Cc: "'John Flynn'" <jflynn12@verizon.net>
Harry, When I was the integration PM for the DAML program I had a lot of trouble explaining the concept of a DAML ontology to potential DoD adaptors (same thing later with an OWL ontology). So, I developed VisioDAML (later converted to VisioOWL) to allow for a graphical representation of the XML syntax. I felt it was important to make the graphical representation an exact one-to-one match to the XML syntax to reduce any potential confusion between the domain experts (who would be working with the graphical representation) and the actual coders (who would be implementing the XML syntax for execution). I used Microsoft Visio as the drawing tool because I had a copy and it was probably the best choice at the time. Since then there have appeared several web-based drawing tools that might make a better/cheaper choice to use, but there doesn't seem enough demand to redo the drawing tools. A number of researchers have used VisioOWL in papers and other publications as the way to express their ontological concepts. It is open source and you can download it at http://semanticsimulations.com. There are other options for graphical representation of ontologies, but I am still a believer in the value of a one-to-one exact relationship between the XML syntax and the graphical representation as I have seen examples when the original XML syntax coders saw their concepts in the graphical form and realized they had made conceptual errors that weren't apparent from perusal of the XML syntax. John -----Original Message----- From: Harry Halpin [mailto:hhalpin@ibiblio.org] Sent: Monday, January 19, 2015 4:11 PM To: Semantic Web Subject: Best open-source ontology/vocabulary visualization tool? Quick question - what is the best open-source best (or a web service) to visualize, preferably as a tree, an existing RDF(S) vocabulary or OWL ontology? There seems to be lots of papers, but little I can find in terms of functional tools! yours, harry
Received on Monday, 19 January 2015 22:33:31 UTC