- From: M. Aaron Bossert <mabossert@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 09:13:05 -0500
- To: "<vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>" <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com>
- Cc: dbpedia-ontology <dbpedia-ontology@lists.sourceforge.net>, Linked Data community <public-lod@w3.org>, SW-forum <semantic-web@w3.org>, "<dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>" <dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
Vladimir, I'm thinking of trying to do some stats on the existing ontology and the mappings to see where there is room for improvement. I'm tied up this week with a couple deadlines that I seem to moving towards at greater than light speed, though my progress is not. As soon as I get the rough cut done, I'll share the results with you and maybe we can discuss paths forward? I'm with you on the 30% error rate...that doesn't help anyone. Aaron On Feb 25, 2015, at 08:02, Vladimir Alexiev <vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com> wrote: >> From: M. Aaron Bossert [mailto:mabossert@gmail.com] >> I am more than happy to work the ML problem with you. > > Hi Aaron! > Would be great to work with someone from Cray but I don't have a good idea how to use ML here, > nor indeed a lot of trust in using ML to produce or fix mappings. > > E.g. see this exchange: > https://twitter.com/valexiev1/status/565814870973890560 > Generating 30% wrong prop maps for the Ukrainian dbpedia is IMHO doing them a disservice! > Who's gonna clean up all this? > > I guess I'm more of a MLab (Manual Labor) guy, I just learned they coined such alias for crowdsourcing: > http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-13704-9_14 > >>> DBO: dbo:parent rdfs:range dbo:Person >>> Wikipedia: | mother = [[Queen Victoria]] of [[England]] >> For your example of the dichotomy with the domain and range of "mother" and >> queen Victoria being the "mother", this begs for contextual approach to that concept.... > > She IS the mother, not sure what you mean. > > Here a simple post-extraction cleanup can take care of it: > remove all statements that violate range (so dbo:parent [[England]] will be removed). > But we dare not do it, because many of the ranges are imprecise, or set wishfully without regard to existing data / mappings. > (As usual, the real data is more complex than any model of it.) > > So we need to check our Ontological Assumptions and precise domains/ranges before such cleanup. > See example in http://vladimiralexiev.github.io/pres/20150209-dbpedia/dbpedia-problems-long.html#sec-6-7 > >
Received on Wednesday, 25 February 2015 14:13:41 UTC