- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 06:02:00 -0800
- To: vladimir.alexiev@ontotext.com, 'dbpedia-ontology' <dbpedia-ontology@lists.sourceforge.net>
- CC: 'Linked Data community' <public-lod@w3.org>, 'SW-forum' <semantic-web@w3.org>, dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I agree that there are problems with the mappings. However, how can the mappings be fixed without fixing the ontology? peter On 02/18/2015 05:03 AM, Vladimir Alexiev wrote: > Hi everyone! > > My presentations from the Dublin meeting are at > > - > http://VladimirAlexiev.github.io/pres/20150209-dbpedia/add-mapping-long.html > > An example of adding a mapping, while making a couple props along the way and reporting a couple of problems. > > - > http://VladimirAlexiev.github.io/pres/20150209-dbpedia/dbpedia-problems-long.html > > Provides a wider perspective that data problems are not only due to the ontology, but many other areas. > 3. Mapping Language Issues 4. Mapping Server Deficiencies 5. Mapping Wiki > Deficiencies 6. Mapping Issues 7. Extraction Framework Issues 8. External > Mapping Problems 9. Ontology Problems Almost all of these are also > reported in the two trackers described in sec.2 > >> Heiko Paulheim <heiko@informatik.uni-mannheim.de> wrote: I am currently >> working with Aldo Gangemi on exploiting the mappings to DOLCE (and the >> high level disjointness axioms in DOLCE) for finding modeling issues >> both in the instances and the ontology. > > Sounds very interesting! > > I've been quite active in the last couple of months, but I've been > pecking at random here and there. More systematic approaches are > definitely needed, as soon as they are not limited to a theoretical > experiment, or a one-time effort that's quickly closed down. > > I've observed many error patterns, and if people smarter than me can > devise ways to leverage and amplify these observations using algorithmic > or ML approaches, that could create fast progress. I give some examples > of the "Need for Research" of specific problems: > http://VladimirAlexiev.github.io/pres/20150209-dbpedia/dbpedia-problems-long.html#sec-6-5 > and next section. > >> Harald Sack: apply the DBpedia ontology to detect inconsistencies and >> flaws in DBpedia facts. This should not only be possible in a >> retroactive way, but should take place much earlier. Besides the >> detection of inconsistencies during the mapping process or afterwards >> in the extracted data > > Sounds very promising! If I can help somehow with "manual ontological & > wiki labor", let me know. Data vs ontology validation can provide - > mapping defect lists - useful hints that the Extraction can use. The most > important feature would be Use Domain & Range to Guide Extraction > http://vladimiralexiev.github.io/pres/20150209-dbpedia/dbpedia-problems-long.html#sec-7-4 > > >> this could already be possible right from the start when the user is >> changing the wikipedia infobox content (in the sense of type checking >> for domain/range, checking of class disjointness and further >> constraints, plausibility check for dates > > I'm doubtful of the utility of "error lists" to Wikipedia (or it needs to > be done with skill and tact): 1. The mapping wiki adopts an Object vs > DataProp Dichotomy (uses owl:ObjectProperty and owl:DatatypeProperty and > never rdf:Property). But MANY Wikipedia fields include both links and > text, and in many cases BOTH are useful > http://vladimiralexiev.github.io/pres/20150209-dbpedia/dbpedia-problems-long.html#sec-3-2 > > 2. At the end of the day, Wikipedia is highly-crafted text, so telling Wikipedia editors that they can't write something, will not sit well with them. > > For example, who should resolve this contradiction: DBO: dbo:parent > rdfs:range dbo:Person Wikipedia: | mother = [[Queen Victoria]] of > [[England]] I think the Extraction Framework (by filtering out the link > that is not Person), not Wikipedians > >> a tool that makes inconsistencies/flaws in wikipedia data visible >> directly in the wikipedia interface, where users could either correct >> them or confirm facts that are originally in doubt. > > But Wikipedia is moving towards using Wikidata props in template fields: > through {{#property}}. > > Cheers! > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server > from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards > with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & > more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, > FREE > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=190641631&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > _______________________________________________ > Dbpedia-ontology mailing list Dbpedia-ontology@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dbpedia-ontology > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJU5JtYAAoJECjN6+QThfjzf0MH/3Heorv9dKd1jx7V72an1SPK Ng0ODtLR1R0/NW6r5ge8tpu0IKt8VG/XdhzcBcycxwfAJZvkMVpeqyo5fvC6yKPQ YP4gq223lys/NccrCOS68t64Y2r2wVh7rQR6q7XI9HUJVkN3sFqk68UzKpvV0K0f 1b5QCOc7Cu+h1iUvKgl+/AnVvtveyRAeCX35bSLAjEyX41DrYx2rB8/xr7KaJMbB XOP11dJvPp7xu0bTrAapW+TVA+WT16XQxo/nwap33tUWmDCikD3cIYOY2TpwD5Er +SbSnTT3KpQjrJocIcxzjMr9zd6Oye0ncoidxRYwgwVOABT/zP945y5qjJnLjg4= =aYso -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 18 February 2015 14:02:38 UTC