Re: Updating the VoID spec

Hi all -

I'm good for with too – I transferred rdfs.org to DERI (now Insight at NUI Galway) some years back to avoid the hit-by-a-bus scenario, but I also feel the option below provides for the stability that is required.

Best regards,

John.
--
[cid:33929766-D4DB-423D-AD90-C1CC77E9612C]
John Breslin http://www.johnbreslin.com
NUI Galway http://www.nuigalway.ie

From: Kjetil Kjernsmo <kjetil@kjernsmo.net<mailto:kjetil@kjernsmo.net>>
Date: Wednesday 5 August 2015 15:15
To: "semantic-web@w3.org<mailto:semantic-web@w3.org>" <semantic-web@w3.org<mailto:semantic-web@w3.org>>
Cc: Dan Brickley <danbri@danbri.org<mailto:danbri@danbri.org>>, Phil Archer <phila@w3.org<mailto:phila@w3.org>>, "Decker, Stefan" <stefan.decker@deri.org<mailto:stefan.decker@deri.org>>
Subject: Re: Updating the VoID spec
Resent-From: <semantic-web@w3.org<mailto:semantic-web@w3.org>>
Resent-Date: Wednesday 5 August 2015 15:15

On Wednesday 5. August 2015 12.58.03 Dan Brickley wrote:
My strong preference would be for W3C (via this IG, a Community Group
and/or the Data Activity leadership) to take over high level
stewardship of the rdfs.org domain, if that option is available.

If that option is available, I would like to record my +1 to that too. :-)

Kjetil