- From: <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2014 16:17:58 +0200
- To: Soiland-Reyes Stian <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, Pierre-Antoine Champin <pierre-antoine.champin@liris.cnrs.fr>, Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 24 Sep 2014, at 16:13, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > And lacking an etag you can generate a fresh uuid. Then the URIs are > unique, yet have a resolvability option. > > Although I still don't like the syntax (it has too many things missing > from the original URI - what about query and ports arguments? Or the > original scheme? Also it's very long..) I can agree that it is an > option that more clearly show that it is a bnode - you would not feel > the need (or normally have the ability to) resolve it - as you would > not find any additional information anyway. > > > Introducing a brand new URI scheme only for BNodes in RDF, and only to > save having to parse a path argument for a client that cares about > network efficiency (which would parse them anyway to avoid ../../ > etc), does however seem a bit overkill to me. perhaps other use cases can be put together to find a wider audience, so that it ends up becoming available. I would say that from the web architecture point of view the current solution is unacceptably bad, and a new URN space is much much better. There are URN schemes for books, and there will be a lot more bnodes than books, so I don't see the problem. Henry > > > > On 24 September 2014 15:03, henry.story@bblfish.net > <henry.story@bblfish.net> wrote: >> >> On 24 Sep 2014, at 15:41, Stian Soiland-Reyes <soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk> wrote: >> >>> This is a very interesting discussion. >>> >>> >>> I believe that unless you are describing truly existential statements >>> ("There exist some foaf:Person which has 2 heads") or get bnodes from >>> inline short-hand syntax like RDF lists in Turtle, then one should >>> avoid BNodes altogether. >>> >>> As it can be difficult to decide on an authority from where to mint >>> URIs - particularly in a mobile/desktop client/server situation - I >>> have often resolved to using urn:uuid URIs like: >>> >>> <urn:uuid:962906b1-d962-4868-a375-605503fbd654> >>> >>> >>> The only downside I can see to this is that you can't >>> deterministically de-skolemize (can be solved by making a new URI >>> scheme as you suggest). When is that needed? >>> >>> Your proposed bnode: scheme has one major flaw - it assumes that bnode >>> identifiers in the referenced document remains the same. There is >>> nothing stopping the server from producing a document with _:b01 and >>> _:b02 being swapped around in the very next second - and indeed this >>> happens in many implementations today. >>> >>> One way I can see around this would be to include a hash (e.g. sha1) >>> of the parsed presentation (or E-Tag), the URI and bnode identifier.. >>> True - it would mean that different representations of the same bnode >>> would give different identifiers (due to content negotiation) - but at >>> least you would not get unintended overlaps. >> >> I agree that there is a use case to attach the bnode to the representation. >> That is why I had the {etag} field in the bnode URN scheme I proposed :-) >> >> bnode:{domain}:{path}:{etag}:{identifier} >> >> If we provide the path, then an etag should suffice, as etags + path give one >> a unique resource version. >> >> Note: I did not spend a lot (any?) of time looking in detail at the URN specs recently. >> So of course one would have to look at what is actually feasible withint the constraints >> of URNs. >> >> Here are some additional criteria that should be followed: >> >> 1- a bnode URN for a document should easily be used in a prefix >> so that one document would only need one @prefix bn: <bnode:....:> . >> statement, for all the bnodes to be able to be declared with that prefix. >> Also future serialisations could then perhaps provide a bnode URN syntax >> such as >> >> =:etag12 foaf:name "Joe" >> >> just as we have now >> >> _:bnode foaf:name "Joe" >> >> in Turtle now. >> >> 2. [to fill out] >> >> Social Web Architect >> http://bblfish.net/ >> > > > > -- > Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team > School of Computer Science > The University of Manchester > http://soiland-reyes.com/stian/work/ http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9842-9718 Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Wednesday, 24 September 2014 14:18:29 UTC