- From: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:27:28 +0200
- To: Richard Smith <richard@ex-parrot.com>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>, Arto Bendiken <arto@dydra.com>
Richard, you can try transforming to TriX: http://www.w3.org/2004/03/trix/ It is the only XML-based RDF quad format as far as I know. Unfortunately not a standard, but supported by some tools, e.g. Dydra triplestore. I wonder why W3C has discontinued work on it, it is definitely useful. The problem is, there are multiple versions of the XML Schema. I have been using the W3C version, but it has an issue regarding triples in the default graph, as far as I remember. It was easy to fix though, let me know if you want a copy of the file. Martynas graphityhq.com On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Richard Smith <richard@ex-parrot.com> wrote: > > Is it still considered good practice to GRDDL as a way of extracting RDF > from custom XML formats? I notice the linked data platform (LDP) candidate > recommendation doesn't makes no mention of GRDDL. > > My XML files logically map to an RDF dataset with multiple named graphs. > Obviously I can't express that in RDF/XML, so I'd need to use something like > N-Quad or TriG to serialise the RDF corresponding to my XML. However > generating these formats is difficult in XSLT because of the need to escape > characters in literals and URIs. Is there a better way of achieving this? > > Richard > > >
Received on Friday, 12 September 2014 09:27:56 UTC