- From: Victor Porton <porton@narod.ru>
- Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 15:28:52 +0300
- To: Hm Hrm <unixprog@googlemail.com>, "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>
01.09.2014, 10:07, "Hm Hrm" <unixprog@googlemail.com>: > On 08/31/2014 06:43 PM, Victor Porton wrote: >> šSuppose P is a precedence of operation X. Should I write "X a P ." or >> š"X :precedence P ." (in Turtle format)? >> >> šWhat are (dis)advantages of both variants? > > Assuming that the property should link instance P to instance X, both of > class :Operation, then you should use "X :precedence P". > > "X a P", a shortcut for "X rdf:type P", would imply that P is an > rdf:Class and X an instance of said class P. Extending the semantics of > 'rdf:type' and using an instance as a class seems a bad idea. P is a class (because I want rdf:subClassOf for properties. But I yet doubt whether an operation should be an instance of precedence. -- Victor Porton - http://portonvictor.org
Received on Monday, 1 September 2014 12:29:23 UTC