- From: carmen <_@whats-your.name>
- Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2014 03:40:18 +0000
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
> should I use two URLs? graphs can (should?) have URIs. a good chunk to section off and give a "named graph" URI is the graph returned in a GET. in a crawler/aggregation scenario, one can then use the graph-URI as a subject-URI in RDF statements, for provenance or logging purposes zooming out, formal definitions on sets of named-graphs http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-datasets/ and zooming in, on what sub-graphs should contain, http://www.w3.org/Submission/CBD/ > two URLs: the object URL and also the URL of the RDF file a "file" is outside the scope of RDF. maybe you're using an in-memory quad-store, or key-val db - http://openmirage.org/blog/introducing-irmin perhaps since a POSIX-style filesystem is fairly ubiquitous (on an Android/iOS phone, there's one in your pocket), it might be useful to talk about scenarios for using them to store RDF, but how you do it is up to you
Received on Saturday, 18 October 2014 03:40:06 UTC