Re: Describing ontological terms in WordNet

Kind of like commented out portion below?

Here is an excerpt from the foaf ontology (
http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/index.rdf):

<!-- FOAF classes (types) are listed first. -->
<rdfs:Class rdf:about="http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/Person"
rdfs:label="Person" rdfs:comment="A person." vs:term_status="stable">
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#Class"/>
<owl:equivalentClass rdf:resource="http://schema.org/Person"/>
<owl:equivalentClass rdf:resource="
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/pim/contact#Person"/>
<!--    <rdfs:subClassOf><owl:Class rdf:about="
http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/Person"/>
</rdfs:subClassOf> -->
-->

-Brent Shambaugh

Website: bshambaugh.org

On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Brent Shambaugh <brent.shambaugh@gmail.com>
wrote:

> If I am constructing an ontology, would it be appropriate to describe all
> of my terms in terms of wordnet?
>
> e.g (the top circled part).:
> http://adistributedeconomy.blogspot.com/2014/10/select-partof-ontology-triples.html
>
>
> context:
>
> which is the w3c part-of relations car example:
>
>
> http://adistributedeconomy.blogspot.com/2014/09/simple-part-whole-class-diagram.html
> (in protege)
>
>
> http://adistributedeconomy.blogspot.com/2014/09/simple-part-whole-relations-diagram.html
> (by hand)
>
> which is a small part of :
>
>
> http://adistributedeconomy.blogspot.com/2014/09/rea-model-applied-to-part-whole.html
>
> where the rea ontology is described as:
>
> http://adistributedeconomy.blogspot.com/2014/09/figuring-out-rea.html
>
>
> -Brent Shambaugh
>
> Website: bshambaugh.org
>