W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > March 2014

Re: What should we call RDF's ability to allow multiple models to peacefully coexist, interconnected?

From: Sampo Syreeni <decoy@iki.fi>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2014 02:59:25 +0200 (EET)
To: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
cc: Alan Ruttenberg <alanruttenberg@gmail.com>, David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403090255080.12609@lakka.kapsi.fi>
On 2014-03-07, Bernard Vatant wrote:

> Seems to me a good illustration of peaceful coexistence of data models 
> is given by LoC MARC relators 
> http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators.html Each of them is at the same 
> type owl:ObjectProperty, skos:Concept, mads:Topic ... Parse what you 
> like, ignore the rest ...

Yes. Indeed. That really is a prime example of doublespeak-readiness. 
The only way you could make it double-plus-gooder would have been to 
reify the whole lot and sign two separate subsets of the eventual output 
with two separate keys. Preferably one from LoC, and one from the Juche 
Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - decoy@iki.fi, http://decoy.iki.fi/front
+358-40-3255353, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2
Received on Sunday, 9 March 2014 00:59:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:36 UTC