On 25 Jun 2014, at 04:21, Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com> wrote: > The second and last values are not allowed according to the OWL, right? Perhaps it should be documented somewhere that the vCard ontology is more restrictive than the RFC. > > Actually, even in the updated ontology definition, the range of vcard:bday still prohibits a plain xsd:date (i.e., when properly formatted, the first example). This should definitely be fixed. Thanks Niklas...we are documenting all feedback and errata on the vCard Ontology NOTE here: https://www.w3.org/wiki/RepresentingVCardinRDFOWL for future revision. Cheers... Renato Iannella Semantic Identity http://semanticidentity.com Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2014 02:16:54 UTC