- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 19:00:53 +0200
- To: Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAK4ZFVGt2J58mnYn0=PSfSoLEqot6inos44gDbk_TQzx0juW6A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Simon 2014-06-17 18:31 GMT+02:00 Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com>: > On Jun 17, 2014 11:19 AM, "Bernard Vatant" <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com> > wrote: > > > Not sure I get your point. I know those documents of course, and BTW > since you mention it http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema has not the bug > (feature) pointed for OWL, since it uses the namespace as the ontology URI, > thus : > > Nope- you got my point :-) > Cool :) > Further poking finds that empty same-doc dereferences in rdf resolve to > the whole document (see > > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax- > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-baseURIs > /#section-baseURIs > > And a maze of twisty RFCs and fall-backs. > > I believe that both patterns are probably correct. > Rule : if A and B are both "probably correct" and equally easy to implement, and you are a standard body, your job is to specify that it MUST be A (or B, but chose once for all). All the point of standards is : for the same result, you could do X or Y or Z, please all do X. See this excellent presentation by Tommie Usdin in Extreme Markup Montréal 2002, which is fortunately still online : "When “It Doesn’t Matter” means “It Matters”" http://conferences.idealliance.org/extreme/html/2002/Usdin01/EML2002Usdin01.html "Users keep demanding flexibility and extensibility, and in one sense giving them syntactical choices is giving them flexibility. But it is not giving them useful, usable flexibility; it is giving them headaches. They want flexibility in the content they create and communicate; they want rich semantics. They are not interested in flexible syntax!" > It is forbidden to treat blah# and blah as being sameAs without an > explicit axiom; i *think* it is an error if ontology is named blah, but is > imported as blah#. > "is imported", you mean in LOV data base for example? See previous answer to Antoine. We do as we can with what we get :) -- *Bernard Vatant* Vocabularies & Data Engineering Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59 Skype : bernard.vatant http://google.com/+BernardVatant -------------------------------------------------------- *Mondeca* 35 boulevard de Strasbourg 75010 Paris www.mondeca.com Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews> ----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 17 June 2014 17:01:41 UTC