Re: gender: Why does vCard Ontology define class hierarchy instead of skos:Concept resources ?

On 2014-06-04, Bob DuCharme wrote:

> vCard is a model for describing people and organizations. [...]

Hmm. Why not just split and unify all of these various concepts as need 
be, and then put up a metavocabulary to describe the chance. Nobody 
would nevermind the metathing much, but at least we could get around 
these constant battles over what is the right way to model some thing 
and what is not.

<a> is the canonical reference to <b> as of <time c>, according to <d>

Oh. That construct already did most of the job. So why are you still 
worrying about the gender list? Deploy already! My last ex was MtF and a 
former Lego engineer, and despite the fb-block, I'm pretty sure she'd 
like to see at least some rudimentary development in even this ontology. 
Well before she and me and all of us feminists land upon it for real.
-- 
Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - decoy@iki.fi, http://decoy.iki.fi/front
+358-40-3255353, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2

Received on Thursday, 5 June 2014 00:02:45 UTC