W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > July 2014

Re: An alternative RDF

From: Simon Spero <sesuncedu@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 13:10:31 -0400
Message-ID: <CADE8KM6QJXPse9t0Q8Bh=gPj7hn45CLzzta-n76ZrgzPQCRgBw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tara Athan <taraathan@gmail.com>
Cc: "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Under RDF/1.1, ill-typed literals are now false [1] -e.g. :

:Bob :gender "M"^^xsd:integer .


is false under D-entailment  *iff* xsd:integer is recognized.


Simon
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf11-mt-20140225/#literals-and-datatypes



On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 3:51 AM, Tara Athan <taraathan@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 7/10/14 10:59 AM, Pat Hayes wrote:
>
>> RDF is an assertional language, and by its very nature is capable of
>> expressing contradictions.
>>
> Aside from giving the same name to two different named graphs, what sort
> of contradictions can be expressed in RDF - without going to at least the
> RDFS entailment regime?
>
> Tara
>
>
Received on Friday, 11 July 2014 17:10:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:49:17 UTC