Re: An alternative RDF

> The trouble is that there may be no more than one :precedence.

Why is that trouble?

If precedence is a functional property, then all values for precedence are owl:sameAs [1].
So there can never be more than one precedence resource by definition;
sure, there can be multiple URLs for that, but that's no problem.

> forcing the programmer (me) to do something with a data which once was consistent but then suddenly became inconsistent.

What would the inconsistency be (i.e., a concrete example)?
And why would that be RDF's fault, and not the data's?



Received on Wednesday, 9 July 2014 19:52:27 UTC