- From: <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:12:46 +0100
- To: Cristiano Longo <longo@dmi.unict.it>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
Dear Cristiano: Thanks for your email. The answer is no - I do not know of any e-commerce portal that crawls and aggregates product / offer information from anonymous sites and provides a “meta shopping cart”. What is happening / will be happening is that if product model master data (like technical specifications / data sheets) are marked up with schema.org/GoodRelations, major search engines and other consumers of markup will likely use those to augment offer data from individual shops, based on strong product identifiers. For offers, I do not expect a lot of content syndication into “meta shopping carts”, mainly for legal reasons - the paradigm of offering some else’s offers implies legal and business risk, so there will always be a kind of sign-on process for participating merchants. You can also see that most price comparison engines now require a legal agreement from merchants prior to relaying their feeds. For product model data from manufacturer sites, on the contrary, I expect a lot impact of publishing data about features and maybe media materials. Many applications will use those to augment offer data from a single site (e.g. Sony publishes the full data sheet, a shop publishes just a short text and UOC/EAN/GTIN-13 code —> Google/Bing/Yahoo/Yandex will show data sheet and offer side-by-side), Martin On 12 Feb 2014, at 13:53, Cristiano Longo <longo@dmi.unict.it> wrote: > Dear Martin, I'm a sofware developer with some research skills in the field of knoweldge representation. I found a mail you sent on the semantic web mailing list (see cc) around two years ago about the pubblication by sears and kmart of their products using semantic web format. I wonder about the converse direction: do you know if publishing the description of a product as RDFa or RDF/XML may favour in entering into the sear or kmart (or some other e-commerce portal) in some way? > > Thank you in advance. > CL
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2014 14:13:13 UTC