- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:40:30 -0500
- To: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- CC: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5298D18E.9070200@w3.org>
On 11/29/2013 09:47 AM, Bernard Vatant wrote:
> Thanks Martinas
>
> I understand those are syntactic RDF/XML sugar. But in that case one
> can wonder why they are defined in the same namespace as proper
> "things" which have specified semantics.
> (Agreed there is no way to change that now, just trying to figure how
> to explain this to beginners looking at the spec).
I agree. My inclination would be have them in the namespace document
as just type "Resource". I know that's redundant, but to a human
reader it makes the point that we're NOT saying they are Properties or
Classes. And then have an rdfs:comment explaining the situation.
How's that sound?
-- Sandro
> Seems to me the good answer in the long run is : forget about RDF/XML
> an use Turtle :)
>
>
>
>
> 2013/11/29 Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org
> <mailto:martynas@graphity.org>>
>
> Bernard,
>
> rdf:Description and @rdf:about are RDF/XML specific constructs, and as
> such don't have much with the general RDF to do.
>
> Martynas
> graphityhq.com <http://graphityhq.com>
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Bernard Vatant
> <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com <mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>>
> wrote:
> > Hi all
> >
> > Aside the debate of RDF namespace, I was looking at
> > http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns document which is
> supposed to
> > define all elements in RDF namespace. But it does not define
> some of the
> > most used elements in this namespace : rdf:Description and
> rdf:about.
> > I was not aware of this, and it triggers two questions :
> > Why are not they defined is this document?
> > Where else are they defined?
> >
> > The point is that if I dereference
> > http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#about it leads me to
> a document
> > where this URI is used but not defined.
> >
> > Providing it's defined somewhere, would it be correct to say
> that rdf:about
> > is a datatype property with range xsd:anyURI?
> > Does the following triple holds?
> > <http://example.org/foo> rdf:about
> "http://example.org/foo"^^xsd:anyURI
> >
> > Thanks for any clarification
> >
> > --
> > Bernard Vatant
> > Vocabularies & Data Engineering
> > Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59
> <tel:%2B%2033%20%280%299%2071%2048%2084%2059>
> > Skype : bernard.vatant
> > http://google.com/+BernardVatant
> > --------------------------------------------------------
> > Mondeca
> > 3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France
> > www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com>
> > Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> --
> *Bernard Vatant
> *
> Vocabularies & Data Engineering
> Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59
> Skype : bernard.vatant
> http://google.com/+BernardVatant
> --------------------------------------------------------
> *Mondeca*****
> 3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France
> www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com/>
> Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews>
> ----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 29 November 2013 17:40:38 UTC