- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:40:30 -0500
- To: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
- CC: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5298D18E.9070200@w3.org>
On 11/29/2013 09:47 AM, Bernard Vatant wrote: > Thanks Martinas > > I understand those are syntactic RDF/XML sugar. But in that case one > can wonder why they are defined in the same namespace as proper > "things" which have specified semantics. > (Agreed there is no way to change that now, just trying to figure how > to explain this to beginners looking at the spec). I agree. My inclination would be have them in the namespace document as just type "Resource". I know that's redundant, but to a human reader it makes the point that we're NOT saying they are Properties or Classes. And then have an rdfs:comment explaining the situation. How's that sound? -- Sandro > Seems to me the good answer in the long run is : forget about RDF/XML > an use Turtle :) > > > > > 2013/11/29 Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org > <mailto:martynas@graphity.org>> > > Bernard, > > rdf:Description and @rdf:about are RDF/XML specific constructs, and as > such don't have much with the general RDF to do. > > Martynas > graphityhq.com <http://graphityhq.com> > > On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Bernard Vatant > <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com <mailto:bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>> > wrote: > > Hi all > > > > Aside the debate of RDF namespace, I was looking at > > http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns document which is > supposed to > > define all elements in RDF namespace. But it does not define > some of the > > most used elements in this namespace : rdf:Description and > rdf:about. > > I was not aware of this, and it triggers two questions : > > Why are not they defined is this document? > > Where else are they defined? > > > > The point is that if I dereference > > http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#about it leads me to > a document > > where this URI is used but not defined. > > > > Providing it's defined somewhere, would it be correct to say > that rdf:about > > is a datatype property with range xsd:anyURI? > > Does the following triple holds? > > <http://example.org/foo> rdf:about > "http://example.org/foo"^^xsd:anyURI > > > > Thanks for any clarification > > > > -- > > Bernard Vatant > > Vocabularies & Data Engineering > > Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59 > <tel:%2B%2033%20%280%299%2071%2048%2084%2059> > > Skype : bernard.vatant > > http://google.com/+BernardVatant > > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Mondeca > > 3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France > > www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com> > > Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > -- > *Bernard Vatant > * > Vocabularies & Data Engineering > Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59 > Skype : bernard.vatant > http://google.com/+BernardVatant > -------------------------------------------------------- > *Mondeca***** > 3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France > www.mondeca.com <http://www.mondeca.com/> > Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews> > ----------------------------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 29 November 2013 17:40:38 UTC