RE: Deprecate http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns# in favour of /ns/rdf# ??

On Friday, November 29, 2013 12:18 PM, Andy Seaborne wrot:
> On 29/11/13 09:04, Dan Brickley wrote:
> > Whatever we do, let's do it in RDFa this time. Humans are at least as
> > important consumers of schemas as computers.
> >
> > FWIW I think some of the adoption we saw back with the FOAF work
> > (apart from being there early) came from having namespace URIs
> > de-reference to (more or less) human readable documentation. Far too
> > many schema URIs point at a ridiculously unreadable XML file that
> just
> > gets saved to disk and can't be opened with any useful tooling.
> 
> Use content negotiation.  Make at least HTML, RDFa, Turtle, JSON-LD
> available.

+1000


--
Markus Lanthaler
@markuslanthaler

Received on Friday, 29 November 2013 14:29:55 UTC