Re: New vCard Ontology draft

Hi All,

Apologies if the following issue has already been discussed.

The current definition of op:hasMember declares the range as a conjunction of classes that are also declared disjoint in the ontolgoy.  op:hasMember is then used to define class:Group. With OWL reasoning, this classifies class:Group as Nothing and any op:hasMember object assertions cause an inconsistency.  Has this already been discussed and is there a proposed fix?

Best,
Shahim Essaid