On 5/6/13 12:03 PM, "Pascal Christoph" <christoph@hbz-nrw.de> wrote: >>>Given that generalization, PDF is not as Web friendly as HTML and >>>friends, >> >> That is a definition that YOU have chosen. It is not one that is used by >> any official standards body, government regulation, etc. As such, it's >>use >> creates confusion amongst the uninformed user and that's certainly >> something none of us want. > >In the contrary , these official standard bodys are uninformed and thus >is the >normal user. They are? Can you provide an example of a recognized standards body - W3C, ISO, ETSI, etc. - or a specific government regulation is that "uninformed"?? >There are many Articles explaining the cons (and pros) of PDF, e.g [1]. > >[1]http://www.siamcomm.com/website-design/using-pdf-files-pros-and-cons/ You will notice in the comments on that page that I noted (back in 2009!!) just TWO features of PDF that the author of the article was UNIFORMED aboutŠ LeonardReceived on Monday, 6 May 2013 16:12:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:33 UTC