Re: The need for RDF in Linked Data

-->>

> Well, if we are going to put a definition, we need to debate the details.
>
[[ Oops, It thought I read a "kind-of" definition somewhere ]]
> IMHO, that's not a very productive activity. The term is deliberately
> "sorta kinda". Trying to change that seems like a bad idea, and getting
> a definition out of something like that is a more or less fruitless quest.
See here [1]. It is a work-in-progress as usual ;)

[1] 
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/gld/raw-file/default/glossary/index.html#linked-data

-- 
Ghislain Atemezing
EURECOM, Multimedia Communications Department
Campus SophiaTech
450, route des Chappes, 06410 Biot, France.
e-mail: auguste.atemezing@eurecom.fr & ghislain.atemezing@gmail.com
Tel: +33 (0)4 - 9300 8178
Fax: +33 (0)4 - 9000 8200
Web: http://www.eurecom.fr/~atemezin

Received on Tuesday, 18 June 2013 16:42:36 UTC