- From: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2013 13:25:41 +0200
- To: adasal <adam.saltiel@gmail.com>
- Cc: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>, semantic-web <semantic-web@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAKaEYhLx7z94x9JNwixONvZrLQ7mQfgye99d_9iSD5p1QL2AMg@mail.gmail.com>
On 14 June 2013 22:31, adasal <adam.saltiel@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear David, > I have read through, and read comments here to your post. > I then looked at your poll question:- > "In normal usage within the Semantic Web community, does the term "Linked > Data" imply the use of RDF? *" > Unfortunately it doesn't seem well formed. Do you mean "imply the * > exclusive* use of RDF"? > I'm not sure the poll will yield anything too helpful because the answer > has to be "yes" although there is no necessity for RDF. > I'm not taking the poll for this reason. > +1 I think this was a key ambiguity It would be interesting to see if the insertion of the works "exclusive" would cause a change of voting. > > Very best, > > Adam > > > On 13 June 2013 18:22, David Booth <david@dbooth.org> wrote: > >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Ending the Linked Data debate -- PLEASE VOTE *NOW*! >> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:19:27 -0400 >> From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org> >> To: community, Linked <public-lod@w3.org> >> >> [Sidebar: A term of art is "A word or phrase that has special >> meaning in a particular context". (The Free Dictionary)] >> >> A heated debate has been raging about the accepted meaning >> of the term "Linked Data" in the context of the Semantic >> Web community -- whether or not this term implies the use >> of RDF. Since this depends on people's perceptions of the >> term's meaning, rather than an official definition, a simple >> poll has been created to settle this debate quantitatively. >> The poll asks: >> >> In normal usage within the Semantic Web community, >> does the term "Linked Data" imply the use of RDF? >> >> PLEASE VOTE NOW at >> http://goo.gl/cbyQd >> >> VOTING RULES >> 1. One vote per person. Persons with multiple email >> addresses are prohibited from voting more than once. >> >> 2. To prevent ballot stuffing, only votes from those who >> have **previously posted a message** on a public W3C email >> list (*before* 13-Jun-2013) will be counted. The W3C >> email search form will be used to ensure compliance: >> http://goo.gl/aqtGW >> >> 3. To ensure that votes are counted correctly (and to >> detect forged ballots), all votes will be verified and >> listed publicly at >> http://goo.gl/PXhRG >> >> Results of this poll may be viewed at >> http://goo.gl/GMeom >> (NOTE: The "View all responses" link on that page is >> auto-generated and cannot be disabled. Unfortunately it >> links to the *editable* version of the response list, >> which should not be shared, so please do not request >> it. The link above at #3 shows the same list in >> read-only mode.) >> >> Thank you, >> David Booth >> >> P.S. Please restrict follow-up discussion about this poll to >> public-lod@w3.org >> >> >> >> >> >> >
Received on Saturday, 15 June 2013 11:26:08 UTC