- From: <Peter.Hendler@kp.org>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:10:29 -0700
- To: brunni@netestate.de
- Cc: david@dbooth.org, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFAD9C5EB0.ABB82AE3-ON88257B83.0063AECB-88257B83.00640B8F@kp.org>
And everyone makes there own SNOMED and HL7. I don't know. We all basically agreed to "a model" when making SNOMED. It would never have worked if everyone could make their own roles. NOTICE TO RECIPIENT: If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail, you are prohibited from sharing, copying, or otherwise using or disclosing its contents. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and permanently delete this e-mail and any attachments without reading, forwarding or saving them. Thank you. From: Michael Brunnbauer <brunni@netestate.de> To: Peter Hendler/CA/KAIPERM@KAIPERM Cc: david@dbooth.org, public-semweb-lifesci@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org Date: 06/07/2013 11:01 AM Subject: Re: Yosemite Manifesto on RDF as a Universal Healthcare Exchange Language Hello Peter, On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:44:55AM -0700, Peter.Hendler@kp.org wrote: > We'll still argue about whether we use SNOMED roles, make HL7 rim classes > and roles or openEHR or something else. Asking for a single extensive ontology about the world - or even about a limited subject - that suits all needs is a bit naive. The nice thing about RDF is that you can have all of them in a single triple store, map them onto each other and make up your own roles if none of them suit you. Regards, Michael Brunnbauer -- ++ Michael Brunnbauer ++ netEstate GmbH ++ Geisenhausener Straße 11a ++ 81379 München ++ Tel +49 89 32 19 77 80 ++ Fax +49 89 32 19 77 89 ++ E-Mail brunni@netestate.de ++ http://www.netestate.de/ ++ ++ Sitz: München, HRB Nr.142452 (Handelsregister B München) ++ USt-IdNr. DE221033342 ++ Geschäftsführer: Michael Brunnbauer, Franz Brunnbauer ++ Prokurist: Dipl. Kfm. (Univ.) Markus Hendel
Received on Friday, 7 June 2013 18:11:42 UTC