- From: Martynas Jusevicius <martynas@graphity.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2013 14:23:37 +0100
- To: Paul Tyson <phtyson@sbcglobal.net>
- Cc: Semantic Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hey all, Graphity [1] is using SPIN templates for SPARQL queries that get attached to ontology classes and are used to query page contents. Queries can also be built on-the-fly using a query builder that uses SPIN API behind the scenes [2]. Martynas [1] https://github.com/Graphity/graphity-ldp [2] https://github.com/Graphity/graphity-ldp/blob/master/src/main/java/org/graphity/util/QueryBuilder.java On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 4:45 AM, Paul Tyson <phtyson@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > Does anyone know if the SPIN submission [1] is likely to get any further > attention and possibly move onto a standards track? > > The W3 acknowledgement [2] indicated it might be taken up by the RIF > working group. > > Before I recently found SPIN, I was about to implement some of > capabilities independently, since my use of SPARQL requires templating, > constraint definition, API documentation, and rule interoperability. > Quite by accident I saw a reference to SPIN and realized it would meet > many of my needs. I'm wondering how others have gotten very far with > SPARQL without using something like SPIN, and if the further development > of SPIN towards a W3C recommendation would advance the use of SPARQL. > > Regards, > --Paul > > [1] SPARQL Inferencing Notation, http://www.w3.org/Submission/2011/02/ > [2] http://www.w3.org/Submission/2011/02/Comment/ > >
Received on Wednesday, 30 January 2013 13:24:04 UTC