- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 18:49:14 +0100
- To: Leandro Mendoza <lmendoza@lifia.info.unlp.edu.ar>
- Cc: "semantic-web@w3.org" <semantic-web@w3.org>, Tom Heath <mail@tomheath.com>, Tom Heath <tom.heath@gmail.com>, Martin Hepp <hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>, Martin Hepp <mhepp@computer.org>
Thanks for the interest Leandro, and thanks for the memory Bernard. History might inform : I set this one up many years ago, thinking it was a good idea, something that needed doing. Tom did his PhD on similar stuff, so (after a bit of (party!) agreement) I handed curation over to him. Talis was looking after it for a bit, but recently the semweb side of Talis fell apart. Then Martin did the product vocab GoodRelations, which I believe includes things like reviews. That has now been taken on board by schema.org, and personally I'd look there first for stuff like this. Which isn't to say the distributed, URI-based approach to vocabs is invalid - if you need anything here Leandro, I'll do my best. I can't remember where the URI redirects go, perhaps you could help me. I should maintain such things. Cheers, Danny. On 20 February 2013 22:01, Leandro Mendoza <lmendoza@lifia.info.unlp.edu.ar> wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know if there is some extra documentation or recent work related > to the Review Ontology (http://semanticweb.org/wiki/Review_Vocabulary)? I've > seen some terms of the ontology whose term_status is "deprecated" (such as > "title", "comment" or "feedback"), but i didn't find documentation (or some > change log) that explain why are deprecated. > > Regards, > Leandro. -- http://dannyayers.com http://webbeep.it - text to tones and back again
Received on Monday, 25 February 2013 17:49:42 UTC