- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:13:23 +0530
- To: adasal <adam.saltiel@gmail.com>
- Cc: semantic-web at W3C <semantic-web@w3c.org>
- Message-ID: <CAMXe=SriAFbd9q9U9mkwnFN5DDhjcY2WmG2VnBM=Bm+mcjV+jQ@mail.gmail.com>
Thanks Adam its a pity I did not know about the Helix spindle before otherwise i would have included it Next time around tho, definitely lucid and def in the right direction, in the sense that it adds dimenality to the process PDM On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 6:20 PM, adasal <adam.saltiel@gmail.com> wrote: > I read this article and found it sufficiently lucid as a base from which > to develop things:- > > > http://alarcos.inf-cr.uclm.es/doc/masi/doc/lec/parte3/kishore-cacm04.pdf > > Adam > > > On 19 April 2013 08:45, Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Greets Yury >> >> Just Enough Ontology (JEO) ;-) is an agile, loose ontology dev process >> that takes into account (and is based on) the main phases of >> existing/known/established methods. (dead or alive) >> >> I say 'loose' and agile because as you may be aware of, it is very >> difficult to implement tightly a methodology with limited team cohesion >> >> JEO starts with stakeholder analysis takes into account views/viewpoints >> (re IEEE 1471), is implementation independent: that is, you can use it to >> guide development irrespective of the tool/platform you end up using for >> encoding the ontology with, however it is in a sense it does consist of >> 'semi-structured' approach. >> >> It is also possible to use fragments of JEO, or adopt it to support a >> subset of the development activities. >> >> It was first written up for customers of a consulting firm in 2008 (the >> methodology is behind a password),however later republished as an open >> access academic paper, a few seminars and tutorials resulted in more >> enlightened attendees, and reasonable outcomes :-) >> >> I started a website that needs finishing/contributors >> >> See links below >> >> Would be interested in feedback anytime >> >> Best >> >> Paola Di Maio (Dr.) >> >> >> >> 'Just enough' ontology engineering >> dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1988698 >> by P Di Maio - 2011 - Cited by 2 - Related articles >> This paper introduces 'just enough' principles and 'systems engineering' >> approach to the practice of ontology development to provide a minimal yet >> complete, ... >> >> A 'Just Enough'Ontology Engineering >> arxiv.org › cs >> Block arxiv.org >> by P Di Maio - 2011 - Cited by 2 - Related articles >> Aug 6, 2011 – Abstract: This paper introduces 'just enough' principles >> and 'systems engineering' approach to the practice of ontology development >> to provide ... >> >> WIMS'11 Tutorials >> wims.vestforsk.no/pro-tut.html >> Tutorial 3: Just Enough Ontology Engineering Advanced functionalities of >> modern IT systems such as the Semantic Web and Web 2.0 tools and >> environments . >> >> >> ( open site to be developed further using the materials linked there) >> https://sites.google.com/site/justenoughontology >> Block sites.google.com >> File Format: Microsoft Powerpoint - View as HTML Ontological engineering >> is interesting. Scenario interpreter. OMNIBUS ontology. Scenario... >> exercise. Simple ... >> >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Yury Katkov <katkov.juriy@gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone! >>> >>> So we have the spatially distributed working group and we want to >>> create the ontology of the problem domain. Which tools+methodologies >>> are there to help? Are there any positive cases of ontological >>> engineering with semantic wikis? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> ----- >>> Yury Katkov, WikiVote >>> >>> >> >> >
Received on Friday, 19 April 2013 13:43:52 UTC