- From: James McKinney <james@opennorth.ca>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 10:39:13 -0400
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
Why create single-property classes like Email, Nickname, FormattedName, Note etc? Is it to allow users to extend those classes? Has that been identified as a real need based on feedback from the last vCard RDF? In any ontology, a balance must be struck between flexibility and simplicity. I'd prefer to have properties like email, nickname, formattedName, note etc that have a range of xsd:string, and to remove all the single-property classes except where there is a compelling use case for extending that class. James From: Renato Iannella <renato@iannella.it> Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 14:02:22 +1000 > The current vCard RDF W3C Note [1] is being updated to incorporate the new vCard RFC6350 [2]. > > A draft OWL ontology has been created [3] to capture the new semantics of RFC6350 and to provide definitive properties for the relevant vCard "kinds" (Individual, Organization, Group, and Location). > > Please send any comments and feedback. > > Cheers... > Renato Iannella > Semantic Identity > http://semanticidentity.com > Mobile: +61 4 1313 2206 > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/vcard-rdf/ > [2] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6350 > [3] http://www.w3.org/wiki/RepresentingVCardinRDFOWL
Received on Friday, 12 October 2012 14:39:47 UTC