- From: Karl Dubost <karld@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 14:14:04 -0400
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
Hi, This is a comment on Microdata to RDF, section 1.1 Background [1] The first paragraph creates a quick introduction and it becomes very quickly negative, such as "Microdata's data model does not align neatly with RDF." The first concrete example is popping up only in section 3.1. It's not very pleasant to read. Suggestions: * Give a very simple markup example of microdata right away * Give the equivalent in turtle. * And explain in this case why it is useful and what someone could do with it. Then move the part about the model differences in a section in between "1.2 Use cases" and "1.3 Issues" with the title "Microdata data model differences with RDF" [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/NOTE-microdata-rdf-20121009/#background -- Karl Dubost - http://dev.opera.com/ Developer Relations, Opera Software
Received on Tuesday, 9 October 2012 18:14:28 UTC