Re: Current agreement upon named graphs


 have been trying to learn about the sw for some time, and take the
opportunity to
test my understanding  answering your own question  (non normative)
 ( the others I not sure)

> Here are my questions:
>  - can a triple belong to several named graphs?

would say yes

>  - can the argument of the SPARQL "GRAPH" keyword  be *a list* of named
> graph?
> if yes, is this list considered to be the union of all those named graphs?
>  - is there a plan to investigate algebra of named graphs, such as :
> (namedGraph1 && !namedGraph2) || namedGraph3?
> Any comment is welcome.
> Cheers,
> Olivier.

Received on Friday, 9 November 2012 14:05:06 UTC