Re: Current agreement upon named graphs

Oliver

 have been trying to learn about the sw for some time, and take the
opportunity to
test my understanding  answering your own question  (non normative)
 ( the others I not sure)


> Here are my questions:
>  - can a triple belong to several named graphs?
>

would say yes


>  - can the argument of the SPARQL "GRAPH" keyword  be *a list* of named
> graph?
> if yes, is this list considered to be the union of all those named graphs?
>  - is there a plan to investigate algebra of named graphs, such as :
> (namedGraph1 && !namedGraph2) || namedGraph3?
>
> Any comment is welcome.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Olivier.
>
>