I also finding striking, along with the humour and irony in this thread, that no one has said the obvious about how this change has propagated:the propagation was unpredictable. Tim Finin writes about GKG here with links to deeper discussions. http://ebiquity.umbc.edu/blogger/2012/05/19/google-knowledge-graph-first-impressions/ As to my own comments they come out of ideas I am developing about the relationship of ourselves as people to such services. What ever their view about the individual (if any) engineers generally exclude the individual from their view of the engineering. But in this context, of course, the individual is reintroduced as a statistical entity and as a linked entity. Meanwhile, the psychologist is concerned with beliefs, intentions and desires. There is much to be said about this. Adam On 19 May 2012 03:34, Jamshaid Ashraf <jamshaid.ashraf@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > When logged in, GKG is working here in Australia using "google.com" but > not with "google.com.au" > > reg > jamshaid > > > > On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Enrique Pérez Arnaud < > enriquepablo@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> 2012/5/19 Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> >> >> I do know how much effort goes into it and can produce much better >>> results with fewer computers. >>> >> >> Metadata is always an extra effort. But I am not (I hope) trolling, I >> actually believe it can get better >> >> >> -- >> Enrique Pérez Arnaud >> enriquepablo@gmail.com >> >> http://npl.readthedocs.org >> > >
Received on Saturday, 19 May 2012 23:10:21 UTC