- From: Michael Hausenblas <michael.hausenblas@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2012 08:08:38 +0100
- To: Heiko Paulheim <paulheim@ke.tu-darmstadt.de>, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org
> Is that still the state of affairs? Are there any practical workarounds? If I'm not totally misunderstanding what you're trying to achieve I'd argue that VoID [1] and the SPARQL SD vocabulary [2] should be capable of doing the job. Tim, care to update the respective sentence in your document? Cheers, Michael [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/void/#backlinks [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-service-description/ -- Dr. Michael Hausenblas, Research Fellow DERI - Digital Enterprise Research Institute NUIG - National University of Ireland, Galway Ireland, Europe Tel.: +353 91 495730 WebID: http://sw-app.org/mic.xhtml#i On 4 Jul 2012, at 07:45, Heiko Paulheim wrote: > Hi all, > > I am wondering whether there is a way of finding a SPARQL endpoint for an LOD URI, i.e., a function f that behaves like > f(<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Darmstadt>) = <http://dbpedia.org/sparql> > > TimBL's design issues document [1] says: > "To make the data be effectively linked, someone who only has the URI of something must be able to find their way the SPARQL endpoint. [...] Vocabularies for doing this have not yet been standardized." > > Is that still the state of affairs? Are there any practical workarounds? > > Best, > Heiko > > [1] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html > > -- > Dr. Heiko Paulheim > Knowledge Engineering Group > Technische Universität Darmstadt > Phone: +49 6151 16 6634 > Fax: +49 6151 16 5482 > http://www.ke.tu-darmstadt.de/staff/heiko-paulheim > >
Received on Wednesday, 4 July 2012 07:09:07 UTC