- From: David Booth <david@dbooth.org>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 13:19:12 -0500
- To: Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com>
- Cc: semantic-web@w3.org
On Fri, 2012-12-14 at 00:39 +0700, Ivan Shmakov wrote: > [ . . . ] Indeed, for my own needs, I've > contemplated “weakening” graphs like the following one: > > _:father a :Person . > :john :father _:father . > :marth :father _:father . > > down to (the Well-Behaved): > > :john :father [ a :Person ] . > :marth :father [ a :Person ] . I think that's a good argument for adding an inverse property syntax to Turtle: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/issues/95 It would allow you to write the following, without weakening what you wanted to say: [ ^:father :john , :marth ] a :Person . -- David Booth, Ph.D. http://dbooth.org/ Opinions expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of his employer.
Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 18:19:45 UTC