- From: Mohamed-Foued Sriti <sritia@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2012 18:44:43 +0300
- To: Robert Stevens <robert.stevens@manchester.ac.uk>
- Cc: David Shotton <david.shotton@zoo.ox.ac.uk>, Silvio Peroni <essepuntato@cs.unibo.it>, semantic-web@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAPu5DiSQnG5jDJgq=eAzA05Gon9vMNF-PXXPhxZo7uQ0LuwWrw@mail.gmail.com>
Thank you all for your help and suggestion, I'll analyze them and give you a useful feedback soon. Sincerely, MF On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Robert Stevens < robert.stevens@manchester.ac.uk> wrote: > > You can find an initial blog about my Family History KB at > > http://robertdavidstevens.wordpress.com/2010/05/04/the-family-history-knowledge-base/ > and there are more recent blogs that have highlighted some things about > this OWL KB. > faCT++ could manage it) It's been used as the basis for an advanced > tutorial in OWL - it maximises inference and also doesn't work in > interesting ways. I think it's nice to look at, but for actualy, practical > applicaitons I wouldn't do it this way at the moment. > > The thing about this FHKB is that it was designed to maximise inference - > it works, but runs like a very slow thing. (last time I checked only > FaCT++ worked). However, the property hierarchy could be re-used in other > settings with ease. One could even attached rules to infer the same > relationships... > > For my FHKB I very deliberately used euro-centric nomenclature for > relationships. > > My friend John Goodwin did his family as linked data: > > http://johngoodwin225.wordpress.com/ > > > > On 30/11/2012 18:25, David Shotton wrote: > > Robert Stevens at the University of Manchester (cc'd) has done a > considerable amount of work mapping family relationships to RDF. I would > consult him. David > > > On 30/11/2012 08:49, Silvio Peroni wrote: > > Dear Mohamed, > > 1. I'm developing now an ontology in which I need to describe persons, > family relationships and book/author information. > Is there a well known (consistent/mature/commonly used) ontologies or > anybody knows or had used/tested/developed ontologies about family or > books. > > > For books, probably you would like to look at the FRBR-aligned > Bibliographic Ontology (FaBiO), available at: > > http://purl.org/spar/fabio > > I think you may also be interested in reading a descriptive ontology > article recently published in JWS [1] about the aforementioned ontology. > > I hope it might help. > > Have a nice day :-) > > S. > > > > [1] - Peroni, S., Shotton, D. (2012). FaBiO and CiTO: ontologies for > describing bibliographic resources and citations. In Journal of > Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, 17 > (December 2012): 33-43. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. DOI: > 10.1016/j.websem.2012.08.001 > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Silvio Peroni, Ph.D. > Department of Computer Science > University of Bologna, Bologna (Italy) > Tel: +39 051 2094871 > E-mail: essepuntato@cs.unibo.it > Web: http://www.essepuntato.it > Blog: http://palindrom.es/phd > Twitter: essepuntato > > > > -- > > Dr David Shotton > Research Data Management and Semantic Publishing Research Group, > Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, > South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK. > Phone: +44 (0)1865-271193 Skype: davidshotton > > > -- > Robert Stevens > Reader in Bio-Health Informatics > School of Computer Science > University of Manchester > Oxford Road > Manchester > United Kingdom > M13 9PL > robert.Stevens@Manchester.Ac.UKhttp://www.cs.man.ac.uk/~stevensrhttp://robertdavidstevens.wordpress.com > > > KBO > >
Received on Sunday, 2 December 2012 15:45:13 UTC