- From: Sergio Fernandez <sergio.fernandez@salzburgresearch.at>
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 20:33:34 +0200
- To: <semantic-web@w3.org>
Mario, sure! Sounds interesting, so just pull a request on github (if you' ve never did it, check the help at https://help.github.com/articles/using-pull-requests ) and Bo or me will analyse and accept the interesting changes. Kind regards, On 28.08.2012 16:32, Mario Rothe wrote: > Hi, > > we finally extended the Specgen Version[1] with the capability to > create groups of concepts automatically. > At the moment the modified version only can be found here: > http://www.csw.inf.fu-berlin.de/ontdocu/specgen/specgen7.zip > It would be nice if we could integrate it into the github repo of > [1]. > > As a result, documentations are created that contains groups of the > conceptual content in the following manner (SWCO Example) > http://www.csw.inf.fu-berlin.de/ontdocu/specgen/swco.html > > We use the Python igraph interface to create the groups, so this > library is needed, besides the rdflib/rdfextras. > The use of groups for the specgen-documentation is optional, to > enable > it just add the --groups parameter at startup. > > Cheers, > Mario Rothe > > [1] https://github.com/specgen/specgen > >>On 1 March 2012 14:51, Gökhan Coskun <coskun@inf.fu-berlin.de> > wrote: >>> We are analyzing this kind of grouping and working on a technique > to >>> automatize this based on the structure of the ontology. >> >>Sounds very interesting... >> >>> Currently, we are working on an extension of SpecGen, so it can > create such >>> groups for the HTML documentation automatically. But this is not > finished >>> yet. >> >>Would you plan to contribute or open it? As we're trying to unify all >>the scattered version of specgen at github >>(https://github.com/zazi/specgen), it'd be nice to push such nice > idea >>there. >> >>Cheers, >> >> >>-- >>Sergio Fernández
Received on Tuesday, 28 August 2012 18:34:03 UTC