W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > August 2012

Re: RDFizing Web 2.0 URIs

From: Breslin, John <john.breslin@nuigalway.ie>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 13:30:45 +0100
Message-ID: <EDE40078-438F-4A79-88FA-1712B1F109A8@nuigalway.ie>
To: Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org>
Cc: "Semantic Web" <semantic-web@w3.org>
Hi Martynas

Another option:

What about using sioc:sibling to link the HTML version to the XML version. I would assume that the HTML version is the main one that has an XML 'sibling'?

Thanks

John

--
http://bresl.in



On 16 Aug 2012, at 10:48, Martynas Jusevičius <martynas@graphity.org> wrote:

> Hey all,
> 
> I'm RDFizing Twitter, and the problem is that its API is not based on
> content negotiation and uses a different set of URIs than those
> serving HTML to end-users (this issue is not Twitter-specific though).
> 
> For example, these URIs return roughly the same data:
> HTML: https://twitter.com/graphityhq/status/235335486707732480
> XML: http://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/show/235335486707732480.xml
> 
> Which URI should be used in RDF? If I'm using SIOC, should it be
> 
>  <https://twitter.com/graphityhq/status/235335486707732480>
> sioc:content "Graphity #LinkedData..." ;
> 
> or
> 
>  <http://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/show/235335486707732480.xml>
> sioc:content "Graphity #LinkedData..." ;
> 
> ?
> 
> SIOC also has a special sioc:link property, and then there is
> owl:sameAs and dct:isFormatOf, so I could relate the 2 URIs:
> 
>  <http://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/show/235335486707732480.xml>
> sioc:link <https://twitter.com/graphityhq/status/235335486707732480>
>  <http://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/show/235335486707732480.xml>
> owl:sameAs <https://twitter.com/graphityhq/status/235335486707732480>
>  <http://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/show/235335486707732480.xml>
> dct:isFormatOf <https://twitter.com/graphityhq/status/235335486707732480>
> 
> Would all of these statements be correct?
> 
> Any best practices for modeling in this situation? Advice appreciated.
> 
> Martynas
> graphity.org
> 
Received on Thursday, 16 August 2012 12:48:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:48:39 UTC