- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 13:59:12 +0100
- To: Denny Vrandečić <denny.vrandecic@wikimedia.de>
- Cc: Semantic Web mailing list <semantic-web@w3.org>, "Peter F. Patel-Schneider" <pfpschneider@gmail.com>
On 2012-08-06, at 13:35, Denny Vrandečić wrote: > Steve, > > thank you for the comments. I appreciate that you took the time for the review. > > 2012/8/6 Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>: >>> PS: I believe that the xsd:date format is YYYY-MM-DD, not DD-MM-YYY. >> >> Yes, it's YYYY-MM-DD. > > I corrected it. > >> Also xsd:integer might be a better choice than xsd:int, to make comparisons with other data easier. xsd:integer is a supported type in SPARQL, xsd:int is not. If you're publishing data in Turtle, then you can just write bareword integers, e.g. 3499879 and they will be xsd:integers. > > I changed this to xsd:integer. Thanks. >> I find the use of predicates with a capital after the namespace a bit jarring (e.g. q:Method), but it's perfectly legal of course. > > It could become even more jarring, as we actually will probably not > use q:Method in the export but rather a numeric ID like q:P17234. > On the other hand, we plan to have q-en:Method owl:equivalentProperty > q:P17234 and q-de:Methode owl:equivalentProperty q:P17234 etc. as > convenience URIs. > But that is a completely different discussion, where the draft is not > finished yet: <http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikidata/Notes/Multilingual_data> > -- I would prefer *not* to have this discussion yet. I will ping this > list as soon as the first draft for that is finished. Ouch. I know you said you didn't want to have this discussion (sorry!), but please bear in mind people building SPARQL queries using a UI - they will have serious predicate URI bloat, and no easy way to pick the "right" URI. I think this would run contra to good URI practice - deliberately creating lots of very similar URIs for the same thing is not ideal. URIs are supposed to be opaque anyway. I think something like q:method rdfs:label "Method"@en, "Methode"@fr, "Methode"@de, "方法"@zh, … is more common, and more user friendly - even if you have to use q:p17234 instead of q:method. - Steve -- Steve Harris, CTO Garlik, a part of Experian +44 7854 417 874 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 653331 VAT # 887 1335 93 Registered office: Landmark House, Experian Way, Nottingham, Notts, NG80 1ZZ
Received on Monday, 6 August 2012 12:59:42 UTC