Re: Press.net News Ontology

Hi Paul,

On 9/8/2011 7:43 PM, Paul Wilton wrote:
> Hi Bernard
> Many of the items on Bobs list we have done for good reason either for
> specialisation of the class, or for contract binding.
> For example pns:Person inherits from foaf:Person as we wanted to enhance
> the parent class, and make relationships to other entities in the model,
> similarly for Location, and Organization. But of course inference would
> result in the foaf statements being published too.
> Again the label / comment properties are subproperties of rdfs:label
> specifically for contract binding reasons.
>

I think collaborative ontology modelling should be done in a project 
independent way, especially if you intend that the ontologies you've 
developed should be utilised by other agents of your address domain (in 
your case the news publisher domain).

> Thanks for pointing out the time namespace , I will fix it :)
> Writh respect to tagging, we are aware of a number of public domain
> tagging ontologies, but none of them have become the defacto tag
> ontology (as foaf has in its domain).

Feel free to choose one to help to establish a defacto tag ontology (I 
thought that's the way how defacto standards are established) ;)

Cheers,


Bo

Received on Friday, 9 September 2011 13:07:48 UTC