- From: Bernard Vatant <bernard.vatant@mondeca.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 19:32:15 +0200
- To: semantic-web@w3.org, Linking Open Data <public-lod@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAK4ZFVEoJNvpEvmaqQe8RwocT6SfH_2ePmCc6Uf4YDxx0BSdRQ@mail.gmail.com>
Adding to Bob's list with which I fully agree In http://data.press.net/ontology/stuff/ the namespace http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/ used for time ontology is not correct. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/Instant is 404. Bing. The time ontology is indeed specified by http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time But the namespace is http://www.w3.org/2006/time# ... speak about good URI practice in W3C specs ;-) Bob is using cute prefixes pns, pna etc. I'm using them as "recommended prefixes" at http://labs.mondeca.com/dataset/lov/ where I just started adding them. (not quite sure if they are in the right vocabulary space, though ...) Best Bernard 2011/9/8 Bob Ferris <zazi@smiy.org> > Hi Jarred, > > at a first glance, here are my remarks: > > 1. pne:Event, pne:sub_event seem to be a bit duplicated. I guess, > event:Event, event:sub_event are enough. > > 2. pne:title can be replaced by, e.g., dc:title. > > 3. pns:Person can be replaced by foaf:Person. > > 4. pns:Organization can be replaced by foaf:Organization. > > 5. pns:worksFor can be replaced by rel:employedBy [1]. > > 6. pns:Lcoation can be replaced by geo:SpatialThing > > 7. Re. the tagging terms, I would recommend to have a look at the Tag > Ontology [2] or similar (see, e.g., [3]) > > 8. Re. biographical events I would recommend to have a look at the Bio > Vocabulary [4], e.g., bio:birth/bio:death. > > 9. pns:label can be replaced by dc:title (or rdfs:label). > > 10. pns:comment can be replaced by dc:description (or rdfs:comment). > > 11. pns:describedBy can be replaced by wdrs:describedby [5]. > > 12. Re. bibliographic terms I would recommend to have a look at the Bibo > Ontology [6], e.g., bibo:Image (or foaf:Image), or the FRBR Vocabulary [7], > e.g., frbr:Text. > > 13. pna:hasThumbnail can be replaced by foaf:thumbnail. > > ... > > Please help us to create 'shared understanding' by reutilising terms of > existing Semantic Web ontologies. > > Cheers, > > > Bo > > > [1] http://purl.org/vocab/**relationship/employedBy<http://purl.org/vocab/relationship/employedBy> > [2] http://www.holygoat.co.uk/**projects/tags/<http://www.holygoat.co.uk/projects/tags/> > [3] http://answers.semanticweb.**com/questions/1566/** > ontologyvocabulary-and-design-**patterns-for-tags-and-tagged-**data<http://answers.semanticweb.com/questions/1566/ontologyvocabulary-and-design-patterns-for-tags-and-tagged-data> > [4] http://purl.org/vocab/bio/0.1/ > [5] http://www.w3.org/2007/05/**powder-s#describedby<http://www.w3.org/2007/05/powder-s#describedby> > [6] http://purl.org/ontology/bibo/ > [7] http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/**core# <http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#> > > > On 9/8/2011 3:48 PM, Jarred McGinnis wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> The Press Association has just published our first draft of a 'news' >> ontology (_http://data.press.net/**ontology_<http://data.press.net/ontology_>). >> For each of the ontologies >> documented, we've included the motivation for the ontologies as well as >> some of the design decisions behind it. Also, you can get the rdf or ttl >> by adding the extension. For example, >> http://data.press.net/**ontology/asset.rdf<http://data.press.net/ontology/asset.rdf> >> <http://**data.press.net/ontology/asset.**rdf<http://data.press.net/ontology/asset.rdf> >> >gives >> >> you the ontology described at http://data.press.net/**ontology/asset/<http://data.press.net/ontology/asset/>.. >> >> Have a look at the ontology and tell us what you think. We think it is >> pretty good but feel free to point out our mistakes. We will fix it. Ask >> why we did it one way and not another. We will give you an answer. >> >> Paul Wilton of Ontoba has been working with us at the PA and has spelled >> out a lot of the guiding principles of this work at >> http://www.ontoba.com/blog. >> >> The reasons behind this work were talked about at SemTech 2011 San >> Fransisco: >> http://semtech2011.**semanticweb.com/sessionPop.** >> cfm?confid=62&proposalid=4134<http://semtech2011.semanticweb.com/sessionPop.cfm?confid=62&proposalid=4134> >> <http://semtech2011.**semanticweb.com/sessionPop.** >> cfm?confid=62&proposalid=4134<http://semtech2011.semanticweb.com/sessionPop.cfm?confid=62&proposalid=4134> >> > >> >> Looking forward to hearing from you, >> >> *Jarred McGinnis, PhD* >> > > > -- *Bernard Vatant * Vocabularies & Data Engineering Tel : + 33 (0)9 71 48 84 59 Skype : bernard.vatant -------------------------------------------------------- *Mondeca** ** * 3 cité Nollez 75018 Paris, France www.mondeca.com Follow us on Twitter : @mondecanews <http://twitter.com/#%21/mondecanews>
Received on Thursday, 8 September 2011 17:33:16 UTC