Martin, I must admit I did not follow all the intricacies of the relative URI->full URI conversion, I usually rely on library functions (I know, I am lazy). But if what you say below is true, isn't that a bug in the microdata spec? Ivan On Oct 29, 2011, at 11:26 , Martin Hepp wrote: > Dear all: > > We had a longer discussion on URI comparison in RDF settings earlier this year. Note that when it comes to writing Microdata parsers, which will be a common thing for LOD architectures, there is a new spec to observe: > > http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/urls.html#resolve-a-url > > AFAIK, itemtype URIs are never resolved this way, but itemprop and href URIs will. > > This may result to different behaviors of queries in RDF settings if the same markup is used in Microdata vs. RDFa. > > Best > > Martin Hepp > > > -------------------------------------------------------- > martin hepp > e-business & web science research group > universitaet der bundeswehr muenchen > > e-mail: hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org > phone: +49-(0)89-6004-4217 > fax: +49-(0)89-6004-4620 > www: http://www.unibw.de/ebusiness/ (group) > http://www.heppnetz.de/ (personal) > skype: mfhepp > twitter: mfhepp > > Check out GoodRelations for E-Commerce on the Web of Linked Data! > ================================================================= > * Project Main Page: http://purl.org/goodrelations/ ---- Ivan Herman, W3C Semantic Web Activity Lead Home: http://www.w3.org/People/Ivan/ mobile: +31-641044153 PGP Key: http://www.ivan-herman.net/pgpkey.html FOAF: http://www.ivan-herman.net/foaf.rdf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 08:45:26 UTC