- From: Richard Cyganiak <richard@cyganiak.de>
- Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 19:03:07 +0000
- To: Steffen Lohmann <slohmann@inf.uc3m.es>
- Cc: public-lod@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org
Hi Steffen, On 17 Nov 2011, at 14:34, Steffen Lohmann wrote: > MUTO should thus not be considered as yet another tagging ontology but as a unification of existing approaches. I'm curious why you decided not to include mappings (equivalentClass, subProperty etc) to the existing approaches. Best, Richard
Received on Thursday, 17 November 2011 21:57:57 UTC