Re: relational data as a bona fide member of the SM

On 2011-11-04, Frank Manola wrote:

> This is an excellent point. The best model for integrating 
> database-style data (which is what I mostly think about) isn't 
> necessarily the best model for other purposes, such as representing 
> statements, [...]

See and the rest of 
the EAR/CR work for my counterpoint. Obviously the triple model is 
better of talking about data. But if you want to actually do something 
real with the data in itself, a relational model is more useful. Those 
two access models aren't then mutually exclusive.
Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy -,
+358-50-5756111, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2

Received on Monday, 7 November 2011 22:35:30 UTC