- From: Sampo Syreeni <decoy@iki.fi>
- Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 00:35:02 +0200 (EET)
- To: Frank Manola <fmanola@acm.org>
- cc: Markus Krötzsch <markus.kroetzsch@cs.ox.ac.uk>, Semantic Web List <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 2011-11-04, Frank Manola wrote: > This is an excellent point. The best model for integrating > database-style data (which is what I mostly think about) isn't > necessarily the best model for other purposes, such as representing > statements, [...] See http://ycmi.med.yale.edu/nadkarni/eav_cr_frame.htm and the rest of the EAR/CR work for my counterpoint. Obviously the triple model is better of talking about data. But if you want to actually do something real with the data in itself, a relational model is more useful. Those two access models aren't then mutually exclusive. -- Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - decoy@iki.fi, http://decoy.iki.fi/front +358-50-5756111, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2
Received on Monday, 7 November 2011 22:35:30 UTC