W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > semantic-web@w3.org > May 2011

Re: GoodRelations Light

From: Richard Levenberg <richard@connectsolutions.com>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 21:08:13 -0700
To: semantic-web@w3.org
Message-ID: <7D10DDAC-3EF7-4E93-B7FE-D26BDA5D36BA@connectsolutions.com>
They used to be termed anonymous nodes

r

On May 17, 2011, at 8:52 PM, Michael F Uschold wrote:

> I have one concern: the term "bnode" may be hard to understand. Is there another term that might be a bit more meaningful to the average potential user? Or perhaps we assume most users will be geeks?
> 
> Michael 
> 
> On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org> wrote:
> Dear all:
> 
> I tried to visualize the minimal RDF pattern for using GoodRelations in a way compatible with both Google and the Semantic Web at large.
> Attached, please find the respective illustration.
> 
> It is meant as a complement to the complete GoodRelations UML diagram.
> 
> Best wishes
> 
> Martin


Received on Wednesday, 18 May 2011 08:47:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:48:27 UTC