- From: Jakub Kotowski <jakubkotowski@gmx.net>
- Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 21:13:27 +0200
- To: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
- CC: SW-forum Web <semantic-web@w3.org>
On 15.05.2011 20:53, Henry Story wrote: > Has the W3c or anyone put together a practical guide on how to name graphs yet? This would be useful. As far as I know the problem may be not only naming but also semantics, see the following thread: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2009Oct/thread.html#msg39 i.e. named graphs should be thought of as "graph literals" - if a graph changes it should get a new name. And by named graphs I'm referring to the paper by J. Carroll, C. Bizer, P. Hayes, P. Stickler. Jakub > > What should the graph names of some well known ontologies be? Assuming to start off > with that we don't want to explore issues of temporal graph names or names of graphs > where the idenity of the requestor has been made available. > > > For foaf should it be: > > + http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/ > + http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/ <- all foaf terms are redirected here with 303 > + http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/knows -> redirects with 303 to spec > > Should owl be: > > + http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl > + http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl.rdf <- Content-Location but 200 > > Sould DC be: > > + http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/ > + http://dublincore.org/2010/10/11/dcelements.rdf <- 302 Moved Temporarily > > One answer may simply be both! That is in a SPARQL query > > SELECT ?clazz > FROM <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> > WHERE { ?class a owl:Class } > > SELECT ?clazz > FROM <http://xmlns.com/foaf/spec/> > WHERE { ?class a owl:Class } > > should both return the same answers. The server serving the answers should do a GET or look up the information in a database that keeps track of redirects. > > Note: for foaf type naming systems I suppose that means that it will take quite a few partial GETs one for each relation or class type, to GET all the initial 303 redirects before one really captures all the named graphs foaf can have. > > Sorry to bring this up. I am sure it's been debated for ever already. If it has please just point me to the answer. :-) > > Thanks, > > Henry > > Social Web Architect > http://bblfish.net/ > > >
Received on Sunday, 15 May 2011 19:13:58 UTC