- From: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:09:51 +0200
- To: Jonathan Rees <jar@creativecommons.org>
- Cc: "Hogan, Aidan" <aidan.hogan@deri.org>, semantic-web@w3.org, Alejandro Mallea <janoma@gmail.com>
On 18 Jun 2011, at 03:59, Jonathan Rees wrote: > Your set of answers for question 1 does not include the one specified > by RDF semantics. > > Namely, that John has a telephone number (which we may or may not know). In the set of answers the following are interpretations consistent with RDF semantics: 1) John has a telephone number, but we don't know the number. 2) John has a telephone number, which is known but hidden from view (for example, for privacy reasons). 3) I do not want John's telephone number to be externally referenced. 4) I do not want to mint a URI for John's telephone number. They all say: there is for sure at least a number for John, but in the graph there is no reference to it. --e. > > So, if one's wishes and intent are to follow the recommendation (whose > purpose, of course, is to enable mutual intelligibility), there is no > way to answer. > > Jonathan > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Hogan, Aidan <aidan.hogan@deri.org> wrote: >> Dear colleagues, >> >> We're conducting some research into the current use of blank-nodes in >> Linked Data publishing, and we need your help. >> >> We would like to get a general impression of the intent of publishers >> when using blank-nodes in their RDF data. Along these lines, we drafted >> a short survey containing *2 questions* which will only take a minute or >> two of your time. >> >> We would be very grateful if you would take the time to fill out the >> poll. We will make the results available online later this month. >> >> **Note that the poll is trying to determine what you *intend* when you >> publish blank-nodes. It is not a quiz on RDF Semantics. There is no >> "correct" answer.** >> >> Link to Poll: http://db.ing.puc.cl/amallea/blank-nodes-poll >> >> If you have been involved in publishing RDF data on the Web (e.g., as >> Linked Data), please provide a URL or a domain name which indicates the >> dataset. >> >> Many thanks for your time! >> Alejandro and Aidan >> >> >> P.S. Please feel free to tweet a link to this mail. However, to avoid >> influencing responses, we would strongly prefer if this email is not >> replied to on-list. If you want to leave feedback, please do so in the >> space provided in the poll, or reply directly to Alejandro (CC'ed on >> this mail) and Aidan. Thanks! >> >> >
Received on Saturday, 18 June 2011 10:10:21 UTC