Thanks, Thomas. Giovanni, it was a coreference resolution problem from my side. You meant 'they'=datasets and I read 'they'=people. It was anyhow a possible question to come by and it's (hopefully) clearer now. Sorry for the confusion. Now to the intended question. I will discuss the issue of availability with my colleagues. But my personal opinion is that availability is an important quality indicator, and should be incorporated if feasible wrt to time and resource availability. Could we perhaps have others (e.g. Sindice, Openlink cloud cache, etc.) also providing their assessment of this specific indicator? It sounds like it's of shared interest and could benefit from multiple independent assessments. What do you think? Cheers, Pablo On Jul 12, 2011 10:54 PM, "Thomas Steiner" <tomac@google.com> wrote:
Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2011 22:22:00 UTC