- From: Neubert Joachim <J.Neubert@zbw.eu>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 14:10:34 +0100
- To: <Semantic-web@w3.org>
When matching and mapping two datasets, it is common that - on both
sides - you find entities which don't have a matching entity on the
other side.
When that non-matching was verified intellectually, it could be valuable
to report this fact - especially to keep track of "false positives"
(e.g. matching labels, but different concepts in SKOS systems).
Basically, this states a relation between an entity - e.g., a
skos:Concept - and a set of entities - as defined e.g. by a
skos:ConceptScheme or a void:Dataset.
Are you aware of any pattern to express this in RDF?
I consider coining something like
ext:noMatchingEntity rdfs:subPropertyOf skos:note .
Since the date of the above mentioned verification should be reported,
you could end up along the lines the following example
<http://d-nb.info/gnd/4125416-8> ext:noMatchingEntity
[ rdf:value <http://zbw.eu/stw> ;
dcterms:modified "2010-01-25"^^xsd:date ] .
What do you think?
Cheers, Joachim
Received on Thursday, 20 January 2011 13:14:50 UTC