- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2011 19:08:20 -0500
- To: Martin Hepp <martin.hepp@ebusiness-unibw.org>
- CC: semantic-web@w3.org, public-lod@w3.org
On 1/17/11 5:09 PM, Martin Hepp wrote: > Hi All: > Thanks for the very useful feedback! > > Just to clarify what I want to do: > > There are many valuable commerce data resources available in XML and > CSV on the Web. It is fairly straightforward to translate them into > RDF, e.g. using GoodRelations. Now, whenever I create an RDF > representation of that data in a new namespace, I may want to store > the meta-data of the original HTTP GET request with which I fetched > the XML or CSV file, and attach that meta-data to the resulting RDF > graph. > > This allows for (1) nice analytics and (2) data cleansing entirely in > the SPARQL / RDF world later-on. > > So the subject to which the meta-data will be attached will not be the > resource URI (because there can naturally be multiple HTTP GET > requests for the same resource), but instead the resulting graph or > dataset. Just double checking that you know the Virtuoso Sponger has always delivered the above. I typically disable this feature as many misunderstand these triples to be noise [1] :-( Links: 1. http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/c/DQ7MQ4 -- ODE session based on Groupon Offer transformation 2. http://uriburner.com/fct/facet.vsp?cmd=load&fsq_id=68 -- shows results for search on entities associated with pattern: application/rdf+xml > > [SNIP] > > > -- Regards, Kingsley Idehen President& CEO OpenLink Software Web: http://www.openlinksw.com Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen Twitter/Identi.ca: kidehen
Received on Tuesday, 18 January 2011 00:09:57 UTC