Re: The truth about SPARQL Endpoint availability

From: Hugh Glaser <hg@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 22:03:26 +0000
To: Pierre-Yves Vandenbussche <py.vandenbussche@gmail.com>
CC: "<public-lod@w3.org>" <public-lod@w3.org>, SW-forum <semantic-web@w3.org>, "<semanticweb@yahoogroups.com>" <semanticweb@yahoogroups.com>
Message-ID: <EMEW3|b1f19d64d068535e32dc5eee7b070790n1RM3p02hg|ecs.soton.ac.uk|890E19A9-96D6->

Thanks.
Has caused me to find two mistakes in our CKAN entries (biolit and opencyc)!

But also, I didn't understand this entry to one of our RKB ones, which has been up as far as I know:
Open Archive Initiative Harvest over OAI-PMH (RKBExplorer)	0%	1,13%

Attachments

image/gif attachment: rss.gif
image/png attachment: endpoint.png
image/png attachment: ckan.png
text/plain attachment: ATT00001.txt
image/gif attachment: 05-rss.gif
image/png attachment: 06-endpoint.png
image/png attachment: 07-ckan.png
text/plain attachment: ATT00002.txt

Received on Monday, 28 February 2011 22:04:28 UTC