- From: Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 10:30:17 +0700
- To: semantic-web@w3.org
>>>>> Ivan Shmakov <oneingray@gmail.com> writes:
Looks like that the first paragraph of the message I've sent has got
mangled away. (I vaguely recall that the inn-workers@ mailing list
had a similar or the same problem with the message bodies starting
with whitespace. IIRC, one of the folks there attributed to
Ecartis, and ISTR that it has disappeared after they've switched to
Mailman.)
The paragraph was:
I'm curious, given that with RDFa and the like I can easily
introduce a “resource”, described within the RDF framework and
using the vocabularies of my choice, why would I prefer, e. g.,
<docbook:application>Foo</docbook:application> in my DocBook XML
document over something along the lines of the following?
> <docbook:phrase
> xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
> xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
> xmlns:foo="http://example.org/classes/"
> about="http://gnuplot.info/"
> property="dc:title"
> ><docbook:phrase
> property="rdf:type"
> resource="foo:SoftwareApplication"
> />Gnuplot</docbook:phrase>
> (Sans that it's more verbose, and that DocBook's ‘phrase’
> doesn't allow for ‘about’, etc.)
> TIA. And HNY.
--
FSF associate member #7257
Received on Saturday, 31 December 2011 03:31:08 UTC